|
HUNGER MESSAGE PROJECT FINDING #4
Voters are willing to spend more on hunger programs
Voters are skeptical about the effectiveness of government hunger programs, but at the same time a strong and growing majority of voters say they would be willing to spend more money on such programs. Seventy-one percent of voters say they would support the United States spending an additional 1% of the federal budget on international aid programs. This includes 44% who say they would “strongly support” such an effort.
Support for this idea cut across political boundaries. A majority of Democrats, Republicans and Independents supported the 1% increase in federal funding. In a similar vein, likely voters were asked if they would support “a program to make sure every hungry child in the world has at least one meal a day available at school even if it costs the United States $3 billion,” and 68% said they would support the program.
| Would you support or oppose the U.S. dedicating an additional 1% of the federal budget to the needs of the world's poorest people, including aid for education, hunger, poverty, clean water, children's health and AIDS treatment? |
| |
Support |
Oppose |
Republican |
55% |
36% |
| Democrat |
83% |
13% |
| Independant |
75% |
22% |
| Men |
69% |
26% |
| Woman |
73% |
20% |
| Hispanic |
87% |
14% |
| African American |
90% |
8% |
| White |
68% |
26% |
FINDING #3
Voters unhappy with
government's efforts
to reduce hunger |
FINDING #5
Voters seek multiple approaches against hunger and poverty |
RETURN TO LIST OF FINDINGS
RETURN TO HUNGER MESSAGE PROJECT MAIN PAGE
|